This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Cold War template. |
|
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
Military history: Cold War Template‑class | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Cold War Template‑class (inactive) | |||||||
|
This template was considered for deletion on 2006 November 15. The result of the discussion was "keep". |
The 'see also' section is for related articles per WP:ALSO, and it seems to me that the possibility of a future Cold War is relevant to this topic. By the logic on display here, the link NATO–Russia relations should also be removed; I'd argue that Cold War II is just as relevant. My restoration was reverted on the basis of "consensus", but I can't find any discussion about this issue on the provided talk page. As such, I've once again restored the link. Regardless of whether a new Cold War has been "verified" or not, the topic of a potential future Cold War falls squarely within the common sense definition of a "related article", and shouldn't be deleted without first obtaining consensus on this specific template. Legoless (talk) 10:27, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
The consensus is to keep the link "Cold War II" in the navigation template. There is no prejudice against revisiting this if the article's title is changed or a merger happens. Cunard (talk) 05:22, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
The link "Cold War II" was added in August 2016. The addition has been disputed. Per Talk:Cold War II/Archive 1#RfC: Accuracy of the title, "Cold War II" should not imply that this is a successor to the Cold War.
Shall the link "Cold War II" be retained or omitted? --George Ho (talk) 18:44, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Add Austrian School to Ideologies -> Capitalism
. 45.148.114.107 (talk) 22:09, 6 May 2021 (UTC)