California Proposition 6, also known as the Safe Neighborhoods Act and The Runner Initiative, is a statutory initiative that appeared on the November 2008 ballot in California. This proposition was rejected by voters on November 4 of that year.
Proposition 6 would have placed additional penalties on gang related and drug crime.
Provisions of Prop 6edit
Proposition 6 would:
Require new state spending on various criminal justice programs, as well as for increased costs for prison and parole operations. This funding is equivalent to 0.3% of California's General Fund.
Authorize prosecution as an adult (rather than in juvenile court, if a juvenile court judge consents) of any youth 14 years old or older who has been convicted of a gang-related felony.
Require that all occupants who are recipients of public housing subsidies submit to annual criminal background checks and lose housing if convicted of a recent crime in order to free up housing for non-criminals.
Increase penalties for several crimes, including violating gang injunctions, using or possessing to sell methamphetamine, or carrying loaded or concealed firearms by certain felons.
Eliminate bail for illegal immigrants charged with violent or gang-related felonies.
Establish as a crime the act of removing or disabling a monitoring device affixed as part of a criminal sentence.
Change evidence rules to allow use of certain hearsay statements as evidence when witnesses are made unavailable due to actions by the defendant.[1]
Requires a 3/4 vote to amend.
Estimated fiscal impactedit
The California Legislative Analyst's Office has arrived at the following summary of Prop. 6's estimated costs:
Net state costs likely to exceed a half billion dollars annually primarily for increased funding of criminal justice programs, as well as for increased costs for prison and parole operations.
Unknown one-time state capital outlay costs potentially exceeding a half billion dollars for prison facilities.
Unknown net fiscal impact for state trial courts, county jails, and other local criminal justice agencies.[1]
Funds to pay for these costs, should Prop. 6 pass, will come from 0.3% of California's general fund.[2]
In the current California state budget, $600 million (0.6%) is set aside to assist with local law enforcement. If the initiative passes, an additional $350 million (0.3%) will be required to enforce some of its provisions.[3]
Patricia Wenskunas, Founder, Crime Survivors, Inc.
Angie Vargas, Mothers Taking Action Against Gang Violence
The California State Sheriffs Association
The California District Attorneys Association
The Association for Los Angeles Deputy Sheriffs
The Peace Officers Research Association of California
Los Angeles Police Protective League
All 58 Sheriffs in California
Arguments in favor of Prop. 6edit
Creates tougher punishment for gang crimes, drive-by shootings, meth distribution and victim intimidation
Creates more effective and accountable intervention programs to stop young kids from joining gangs.
Helps victims who have been intimidated by gang criminals
It provides additional funds for victim-witness protection programs.
Prohibits bail for illegal aliens who are charged with violent or gang crimes.
Ensures additional funding for local police, sheriff, district attorneys and probation officers.[8]
Radio adsedit
Excerpt of Radio Ad from the Committee to Take Back Our Neighborhoods
Radio Ad from the Peace Officers Research Association of California
Path to the ballotedit
The petition drive to place the measure on the ballot was conducted by National Petition Management, at a cost of $1.022 million.[10]
Supporters turned in over 750,000 signatures on April 25 to qualify the measure for the November 2008 ballot, and the measure was subsequently approved for the ballot.,[11][12]
Donors who support Prop. 6edit
As of July 14, 2008, eight of the largest donors to Prop. 6 included:
The Peace Officer Research Association, $25,000[13]
Nicholas, who was arraigned on June 16, 2008 and pleaded not guilty on charges that included drug use, security fraud and conspiracy and has withdrawn from active support of the initiative, though the campaign has stated they will not return his $1,000,000 contribution. Ironically he is also charged with possession of methamphetamine with intent to distribute, meaning he himself would receive the tougher penalties of this initiative.[14][15][16][17][18]
Opposition to Prop. 6edit
The official committee opposing Proposition 6 is known as No on Propositions 6 & 9, Communities for Safe Neighborhoods and Fiscal Responsibility.
It diverts billions from California's schools, hospitals and childcare centers by funding failed prison and policing policies, deepening the state's ongoing budget crisis.[20]
It targets youth for adult incarceration by deeming any youth 14 years or older who is convicted of a "gang-related" felony must be tried as an adult.
It targets poor people by requiring recipients of public housing subsidies to submit to annual criminal background checks and withdrawing the housing subsidies of people with recent criminal convictions.
It targets illegal aliens by denying bail to those that are charged with violent or gang-related crimes and requires local sheriffs to inform Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) of the arrests.
Individuals who are not affiliated with gangs are listed in gang databases and may be falsely prosecuted under this provision.[21]
Donors who oppose Prop. 6edit
The name of the official campaign committee opposing Prop. 6 is No on Propositions 6 & 9, Communities for Safe Neighborhoods.[22]
As of September 5, 2008, the five largest donors against Prop. 6 consisted of the Ella Baker Center and four labor unions:
^http://www.ebudget.ca.gov/BudgetSummary/SUM/1249561.html Archived 2008-10-19 at the Wayback Machine "California's Budget 2008" California Department of Finance
^"Runners support initiative against gender law, Daily Press, Dec. 30, 2007". Archived from the original on 2008-11-21. Retrieved 2008-10-08.
^"Supervisor Gary Ovitt". Archived from the original on 2008-11-14. Retrieved 2008-10-29.
^"Senator George Runner". Archived from the original on 2008-10-07. Retrieved 2008-10-08.
^"A Message From Senator George Runner, Oct. 27, 2008". Archived from the original on 2008-10-08. Retrieved 2008-10-08.
^http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/years/2008/0605082nicholas1.html "Henry Nicholas charged with, among other things, possession of methamphetamine with intent to distribute"
^http://news.muckety.com/2008/06/13/indicted-billionaire-henry-nicholas-iii-crusaded-for-tough-penalties-for-criminals/3401 Archived 2008-09-28 at the Wayback Machine "Indicted billionaire Henry Nicholas III crusaded for tough penalties for criminals"
^Los Angeles Times "Initiative sponsor in spotlight"
^http://www.sacbee.com/static/weblogs/capitolalertlatest/013300.html Archived 2008-10-12 at the Wayback Machine "Nicholas pleads not guilty"
^"List of Prop 6 opponents". Archived from the original on 2008-09-09. Retrieved 2008-10-08.
^"Tabulations from a survey of California Registered Voters about the State's Budget Deficit" (PDF). Field Research Corporation. 2008-06-10. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2020-09-04.
^Gang Wars: The Failure of Enforcement Tactics and the Need for Effective Public Safety Strategies, Loren Siegel, 2003
^"Defeat the Runner Initiative". Archived from the original on 2008-07-27. Retrieved 2008-07-12.
^Details of donations to the No on 6 & 9 committee
^Los Angeles Times, "No on Proposition 6", September 26, 2008
^"Statement of Vote: 2008 General Election" (PDF). California Secretary of State. 2008-12-13. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2012-10-18. Retrieved 2009-02-21.
External linksedit
Proposition 6 on Ballotpedia
Yes on Prop 6, supporters of Prop. 6
Defeat the Runner Initiative, opponents of Prop. 6.
Further readingedit
State Sen. Runner throws support behind anti-gang proposition, June 27, 2008.
Ella Baker Center contributes to campaigns against two propositions, July 9, 2008.