1928 United States presidential election in Connecticut

Summary

The 1928 United States presidential election in Connecticut took place on November 6, 1928, as part of the 1928 United States presidential election which was held throughout all contemporary 48 states. Voters chose seven representatives, or electors to the Electoral College, who voted for president and vice president.

1928 United States presidential election in Connecticut

← 1924 November 6, 1928 1932 →
 
Nominee Herbert Hoover Al Smith
Party Republican Democratic
Home state California New York
Running mate Charles Curtis Joseph Taylor Robinson
Electoral vote 7 0
Popular vote 296,641 252,085
Percentage 53.63% 45.57%

County Results

President before election

Calvin Coolidge
Republican

Elected President

Herbert Hoover
Republican

During the Third Party System, Connecticut was one of a small number of critical swing states due to its opposing Democratic Catholic and Republican Yankee populations being closely matched at the polls.[1] However, the fear William Jennings Bryan generated amongst the northeastern industrial elite,[2] and among Catholic voters who belonged to a church that condemned free silver,[3] meant that after the “Panic of 1893” Connecticut became substantially a one-party Republican state, although not to the same degree as many states in upper New England, the Midwest or the Pacific.[4] No Democrat would serve as a United States Senator from the state during the “System of 1896”, and only one Democrat would serve as Governor — the aging Simeon Eben Baldwin.

In 1920 and 1924 Democratic nominees James M. Cox and John W. Davis had carried only one and three towns respectively in Connecticut, with Southern Democrat Davis winning only 27.53 percent of the state’s vote. However, in 1928, the Democratic Party nominated Alfred E. Smith, a New York City-born Roman Catholic of Irish, Italian, and German immigrant heritage, who appealed greatly to the urban ethnic and Catholic immigrant populations that populated northeastern states like Connecticut.[5] Smith was the first Catholic ever to be nominated for president on a major party presidential ticket, and while his Catholicism greatly weakened his candidacy in many rural parts of the United States, especially in the traditionally Democratic “Solid South” and the pro-La Follette[a] Pacific Northwest,[7] Catholics across the United States identified with him greatly.

In straw poll from late September, Republican nominees, former Secretary of Commerce Herbert Hoover of California and Senate Majority Leader Charles Curtis of Kansas, was narrowly leading Smith and Senator Joseph Taylor Robinson of Arkansas.[8] However, another straw poll from early October saw Hoover leading Smith in Connecticut by more than two-to-one,[9] and a similar results was obtained with a larger poll mid-month.[10] The Boston Globe in the second week also saw Hoover carrying the state,[11] as did a later poll that nonetheless thought Smith was helped in Connecticut by his opposition to Prohibition.[12]

Hoover ultimately won Connecticut by 8.06 percentage points; however, this was a major Democratic advance on the 1920 and 1924 party results when the Republicans won by 34.01 and 29.69 points respectively with Smith carrying seventeen towns that voted for Calvin Coolidge in 1924. Most critically, Smith carried the four most populous towns of Hartford,[b] New London, Bridgeport and Waterbury. He also became the first Democrat ever to carry the towns of Enfield and Putnam and the first since 1852 to carry Plainfield and Thompson, all of which were home to large Catholic populations. Whereas in 1924 Connecticut had been Coolidge’s seventh-best state, in 1928 it was Catholic Smith’s fourteenth-best state of forty-eight, and voted 9.36 points more Democratic than the nation at-large, this being the first time since 1892 Connecticut had been more Democratic than the nation.

Results edit

1928 United States presidential election in Connecticut[13]
Party Candidate Running mate Popular vote Electoral vote
Count % Count %
Republican Herbert Hoover of California Charles Curtis of Kansas 296,641 53.63% 7 100.00%
Democratic Al Smith of New York Joseph Taylor Robinson of Arkansas 252,085 45.57% 0 0.00%
Socialist Norman Thomas of New York James Hudson Maurer of Pennsylvania 3,029 0.55% 0 0.00%
Communist William Z. Foster of Massachusetts Benjamin Gitlow of New York 738 0.13% 0 0.00%
Socialist Labor Verne L. Reynolds of Michigan Jeremiah D. Crowley of New York 625 0.10% 0 0.00%
N/A Others Others 6 0.01% 0 0.00%
Total 553,124 100.00% 7 100.00%

By county edit

1928 United States presidential election in Connecticut (by county) [14]
County Hoover % Hoover # Smith % Smith # Others % Others # Total #
Fairfield 55.8% 71,388 43.4% 55,488 0.8% 1,043 127,919
Hartford 53.2% 75,997 46.0% 65,789 0.8% 1,167 142,953
Litchfield 63.7% 19,154 35.8% 10,761 0.5% 138 30,053
Middlesex 59.9% 11,204 39.5% 7,380 0.6% 112 18,696
New Haven 49.1% 80,952 50.1% 82,623 0.9% 1,435 165,010
New London 56.3% 21,378 42.9% 16,297 0.8% 288 37,963
Tolland 59.8% 6,502 39.1% 4,255 1.1% 125 10,882
Windham 51.4% 10,039 48.3% 9,447 0.3% 63 19,549

By town edit

1928 United States presidential election in Connecticut (by town)
Town Herbert Clark Hoover
Republican
Alfred Emmanuel Smith
Democratic
Norman Mattoon Thomas
Socialist
William Zebulon Foster
Communist
Verne L. Reynolds
Socialist Labor
Margin Total votes cast
# % # % # % # % # % # %
Andover 126 61.46% 78 38.05% 1 0.49% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 48 23.41% 205
Ansonia 3,209 49.05% 3,269 49.97% 51 0.78% 5 0.08% 8 0.12% -60 -0.92% 6,542
Ashford 145 54.31% 120 44.94% 2 0.75% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 25 9.36% 267
Avon 369 67.34% 172 31.39% 5 0.91% 1 0.18% 1 0.18% 197 35.95% 548
Barkhamsted 241 78.25% 66 21.43% 1 0.32% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 175 56.82% 308
Beacon Falls 310 57.94% 217 40.56% 1 0.19% 7 1.31% 0 0.00% 93 17.38% 535
Berlin 1,032 66.11% 521 33.38% 2 0.13% 4 0.26% 2 0.13% 511 32.74% 1,561
Bethany 119 74.38% 40 25.00% 1 0.63% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 79 49.38% 160
Bethel 1,313 68.92% 588 30.87% 4 0.21% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 725 38.06% 1,905
Bethlehem 187 80.26% 46 19.74% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 141 60.52% 233
Bloomfield 683 60.98% 404 36.07% 18 1.61% 8 0.71% 7 0.63% 279 24.91% 1,120
Bolton 121 62.37% 73 37.63% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 48 24.74% 194
Bozrah 169 47.21% 186 51.96% 1 0.28% 1 0.28% 1 0.28% -17 -4.75% 358
Branford 1,826 64.32% 1,001 35.26% 6 0.21% 5 0.18% 1 0.04% 825 29.06% 2,839
Bridgeport 21,019 45.69% 24,448 53.14% 372 0.81% 85 0.18% 82 0.18% -3,429 -7.45% 46,006
Bridgewater 163 74.09% 56 25.45% 1 0.45% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 107 48.64% 220
Bristol 5,028 59.10% 3,404 40.01% 55 0.65% 16 0.19% 4 0.05% 1,624 19.09% 8,507
Brookfield 313 75.06% 104 24.94% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 209 50.12% 417
Brooklyn 346 49.50% 352 50.36% 1 0.14% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% -6 -0.86% 699
Burlington 205 65.50% 104 33.23% 2 0.64% 2 0.64% 0 0.00% 101 32.27% 313
Canaan 190 74.51% 65 25.49% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 125 49.02% 255
Canterbury 208 68.20% 92 30.16% 4 1.31% 1 0.33% 0 0.00% 116 38.03% 305
Canton 689 69.95% 291 29.54% 5 0.51% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 398 40.41% 985
Chaplin 119 75.32% 36 22.78% 2 1.27% 1 0.63% 0 0.00% 83 52.53% 158
Cheshire 941 75.22% 310 24.78% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 631 50.44% 1,251
Chester 387 64.50% 211 35.17% 2 0.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 176 29.33% 600
Clinton 521 74.64% 173 24.79% 4 0.57% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 348 49.86% 698
Colchester 373 54.93% 299 44.04% 6 0.88% 1 0.15% 0 0.00% 74 10.90% 679
Colebrook 181 73.58% 65 26.42% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 116 47.15% 246
Columbia 149 62.61% 87 36.55% 2 0.84% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 62 26.05% 238
Cornwall 298 76.02% 91 23.21% 3 0.77% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 207 52.81% 392
Coventry 465 63.87% 262 35.99% 1 0.14% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 203 27.88% 728
Cromwell 659 69.22% 287 30.15% 1 0.11% 3 0.32% 2 0.21% 372 39.08% 952
Danbury 5,974 54.76% 4,895 44.87% 23 0.21% 13 0.12% 4 0.04% 1,079 9.89% 10,909
Darien 1,681 73.44% 598 26.12% 7 0.31% 0 0.00% 3 0.13% 1,083 47.31% 2,289
Derby 1,151 33.12% 2,294 66.01% 27 0.78% 2 0.06% 1 0.03% -1,143 -32.89% 3,475
Durham 360 79.65% 92 20.35% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 268 59.29% 452
East Granby 202 66.89% 97 32.12% 0 0.00% 2 0.66% 1 0.33% 105 34.77% 302
East Haddam 476 65.03% 253 34.56% 3 0.41% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 223 30.46% 732
East Hampton 713 55.57% 566 44.12% 2 0.16% 2 0.16% 0 0.00% 147 11.46% 1,283
East Hartford 3,506 56.02% 2,725 43.54% 13 0.21% 6 0.10% 8 0.13% 781 12.48% 6,258
East Haven 1,506 63.95% 829 35.20% 13 0.55% 4 0.17% 3 0.13% 677 28.75% 2,355
East Lyme 617 73.10% 219 25.95% 7 0.83% 1 0.12% 0 0.00% 398 47.16% 844
East Windsor 757 61.85% 452 36.93% 13 1.06% 2 0.16% 0 0.00% 305 24.92% 1,224
Eastford 171 83.01% 35 16.99% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 136 66.02% 206
Easton 282 75.00% 88 23.40% 5 1.33% 1 0.27% 0 0.00% 194 51.60% 376
Ellington 473 60.72% 298 38.25% 4 0.51% 0 0.00% 4 0.51% 175 22.46% 779
Enfield 1,861 44.01% 2,362 55.85% 4 0.09% 2 0.05% 0 0.00% -501 -11.85% 4,229
Essex 918 73.91% 318 25.60% 4 0.32% 2 0.16% 0 0.00% 600 48.31% 1,242
Fairfield 3,041 63.66% 1,698 35.55% 30 0.63% 4 0.08% 4 0.08% 1,343 28.11% 4,777
Farmington 1,008 54.02% 849 45.50% 9 0.48% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 159 8.52% 1,866
Franklin 142 72.82% 53 27.18% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 89 45.64% 195
Glastonbury 1,258 59.34% 852 40.19% 8 0.38% 2 0.09% 0 0.00% 406 19.15% 2,120
Goshen 185 82.96% 37 16.59% 1 0.45% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 148 66.37% 223
Granby 462 85.40% 78 14.42% 1 0.18% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 384 70.98% 541
Greenwich 6,413 65.29% 3,363 34.24% 38 0.39% 5 0.05% 3 0.03% 3,050 31.05% 9,822
Griswold 603 43.54% 778 56.17% 4 0.29% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% -175 -12.64% 1,385
Groton 2,427 77.15% 704 22.38% 12 0.38% 3 0.10% 0 0.00% 1,723 54.77% 3,146
Guilford 886 68.63% 401 31.06% 2 0.15% 2 0.15% 0 0.00% 485 37.57% 1,291
Haddam 546 75.31% 176 24.28% 3 0.41% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 370 51.03% 725
Hamden 4,122 64.90% 2,163 34.06% 55 0.87% 3 0.05% 8 0.13% 1,959 30.85% 6,351
Hampton 177 79.37% 44 19.73% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 0.90% 133 59.64% 223
Hartford 25,351 43.75% 32,102 55.40% 280 0.48% 117 0.20% 101 0.17% -6,751 -11.65% 57,951
Hartland 108 81.82% 23 17.42% 0 0.00% 1 0.76% 0 0.00% 85 64.39% 132
Harwinton 220 76.39% 67 23.26% 1 0.35% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 153 53.13% 288
Hebron 193 64.12% 108 35.88% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 85 28.24% 301
Kent 312 68.12% 146 31.88% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 166 36.24% 458
Killingly 1,557 53.75% 1,334 46.05% 5 0.17% 0 0.00% 1 0.03% 223 7.70% 2,897
Killingworth 99 64.71% 53 34.64% 1 0.65% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 46 30.07% 153
Lebanon 344 81.90% 75 17.86% 1 0.24% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 269 64.05% 420
Ledyard 261 83.92% 49 15.76% 1 0.32% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 212 68.17% 311
Lisbon 219 67.18% 105 32.21% 2 0.61% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 114 34.97% 326
Litchfield 979 65.18% 514 34.22% 6 0.40% 1 0.07% 2 0.13% 465 30.96% 1,502
Lyme 219 85.55% 34 13.28% 2 0.78% 0 0.00% 1 0.39% 185 72.27% 256
Madison 656 71.15% 264 28.63% 2 0.22% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 392 42.52% 922
Manchester 5,205 67.30% 2,473 31.98% 48 0.62% 6 0.08% 2 0.03% 2,732 35.32% 7,734
Mansfield 696 76.23% 209 22.89% 8 0.88% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 487 53.34% 913
Marlborough 70 47.62% 71 48.30% 3 2.04% 1 0.68% 2 1.36% -1 -0.68% 147
Meriden 8,204 52.46% 7,329 46.86% 71 0.45% 20 0.13% 15 0.10% 875 5.59% 15,639
Middlebury 366 80.26% 88 19.30% 2 0.44% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 278 60.96% 456
Middlefield 231 76.49% 70 23.18% 0 0.00% 1 0.33% 0 0.00% 161 53.31% 302
Middletown 3,980 51.18% 3,738 48.06% 37 0.48% 8 0.10% 14 0.18% 242 3.11% 7,777
Milford 3,536 67.82% 1,618 31.03% 48 0.92% 6 0.12% 6 0.12% 1,918 36.79% 5,214
Monroe 362 69.88% 151 29.15% 2 0.39% 0 0.00% 3 0.58% 211 40.73% 518
Montville 664 60.69% 425 38.85% 3 0.27% 2 0.18% 0 0.00% 239 21.85% 1,094
Morris 160 68.67% 73 31.33% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 87 37.34% 233
Naugatuck 2,459 46.59% 2,773 52.54% 24 0.45% 9 0.17% 13 0.25% -314 -5.95% 5,278
New Britain 10,116 50.34% 9,703 48.28% 222 1.10% 20 0.10% 35 0.17% 413 2.06% 20,096
New Canaan 1,298 67.53% 614 31.95% 6 0.31% 2 0.10% 2 0.10% 684 35.59% 1,922
New Fairfield 155 76.35% 48 23.65% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 107 52.71% 203
New Hartford 435 58.78% 304 41.08% 1 0.14% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 131 17.70% 740
New Haven 24,898 42.87% 32,531 56.01% 490 0.84% 103 0.18% 58 0.10% -7,633 -13.14% 58,080
New London 4,668 51.61% 4,309 47.64% 53 0.59% 8 0.09% 6 0.07% 359 3.97% 9,044
New Milford 1,441 68.23% 659 31.20% 8 0.38% 3 0.14% 1 0.05% 782 37.03% 2,112
Newington 879 76.17% 262 22.70% 11 0.95% 1 0.09% 1 0.09% 617 53.47% 1,154
Newtown 663 52.45% 599 47.39% 1 0.08% 1 0.08% 0 0.00% 64 5.06% 1,264
Norfolk 461 57.55% 340 42.45% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 121 15.11% 801
North Branford 231 65.25% 122 34.46% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 0.28% 109 30.79% 354
North Canaan 644 70.69% 264 28.98% 0 0.00% 1 0.11% 2 0.22% 380 41.71% 911
North Haven 960 77.80% 265 21.47% 8 0.65% 1 0.08% 0 0.00% 695 56.32% 1,234
North Stonington 320 79.40% 79 19.60% 3 0.74% 1 0.25% 0 0.00% 241 59.80% 403
Norwalk 7,865 61.32% 4,867 37.95% 38 0.30% 15 0.12% 41 0.32% 2,998 23.37% 12,826
Norwich 5,329 47.53% 5,788 51.62% 77 0.69% 7 0.06% 12 0.11% -459 -4.09% 11,213
Old Lyme 398 72.63% 147 26.82% 2 0.36% 0 0.00% 1 0.18% 251 45.80% 548
Old Saybrook 459 65.20% 244 34.66% 1 0.14% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 215 30.54% 704
Orange 469 84.20% 88 15.80% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 381 68.40% 557
Oxford 272 73.32% 98 26.42% 1 0.27% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 174 46.90% 371
Plainfield 1,238 42.54% 1,659 57.01% 11 0.38% 1 0.03% 1 0.03% -421 -14.47% 2,910
Plainville 1,418 70.51% 581 28.89% 7 0.35% 2 0.10% 3 0.15% 837 41.62% 2,011
Plymouth 981 59.64% 654 39.76% 7 0.43% 3 0.18% 0 0.00% 327 19.88% 1,645
Pomfret 427 62.43% 256 37.43% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 1 0.15% 171 25.00% 684
Portland 950 55.33% 755 43.97% 11 0.64% 1 0.06% 0 0.00% 195 11.36% 1,717
Preston 357 78.63% 95 20.93% 1 0.22% 1 0.22% 0 0.00% 262 57.71% 454
Prospect 138 73.80% 48 25.67% 1 0.53% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 90 48.13% 187
Putnam 1,289 46.07% 1,501 53.65% 8 0.29% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% -212 -7.58% 2,798
Redding 488 69.12% 218 30.88% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 270 38.24% 706
Ridgefield 955 73.46% 341 26.23% 2 0.15% 2 0.15% 0 0.00% 614 47.23% 1,300
Rocky Hill 486 68.74% 216 30.55% 5 0.71% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 270 38.19% 707
Roxbury 180 64.29% 98 35.00% 1 0.36% 1 0.36% 0 0.00% 82 29.29% 280
Salem 87 71.90% 34 28.10% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 53 43.80% 121
Salisbury 841 70.85% 339 28.56% 5 0.42% 0 0.00% 2 0.17% 502 42.29% 1,187
Saybrook 584 63.27% 335 36.29% 3 0.33% 0 0.00% 1 0.11% 249 26.98% 923
Scotland 128 78.05% 36 21.95% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 92 56.10% 164
Seymour 1,433 70.07% 606 29.63% 3 0.15% 2 0.10% 1 0.05% 827 40.44% 2,045
Sharon 503 77.98% 137 21.24% 3 0.47% 2 0.31% 0 0.00% 366 56.74% 645
Shelton 1,959 57.47% 1,406 41.24% 30 0.88% 6 0.18% 8 0.23% 553 16.22% 3,409
Sherman 99 69.72% 40 28.17% 1 0.70% 1 0.70% 1 0.70% 59 41.55% 142
Simsbury 695 60.49% 450 39.16% 1 0.09% 1 0.09% 2 0.17% 245 21.32% 1,149
Somers 422 62.33% 252 37.22% 3 0.44% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 170 25.11% 677
South Windsor 459 56.60% 344 42.42% 6 0.74% 2 0.25% 0 0.00% 115 14.18% 811
Southbury 358 73.66% 127 26.13% 0 0.00% 1 0.21% 0 0.00% 231 47.53% 486
Southington 1,611 53.90% 1,369 45.80% 6 0.20% 2 0.07% 1 0.03% 242 8.10% 2,989
Sprague 365 40.92% 524 58.74% 3 0.34% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% -159 -17.83% 892
Stafford 1,134 51.20% 1,060 47.86% 13 0.59% 2 0.09% 6 0.27% 74 3.34% 2,215
Stamford 10,014 54.84% 8,106 44.39% 71 0.39% 50 0.27% 20 0.11% 1,908 10.45% 18,261
Sterling 330 61.80% 202 37.83% 2 0.37% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 128 23.97% 534
Stonington 2,565 57.22% 1,876 41.85% 28 0.62% 7 0.16% 7 0.16% 689 15.37% 4,483
Stratford 4,089 67.13% 1,965 32.26% 23 0.38% 9 0.15% 5 0.08% 2,124 34.87% 6,091
Suffield 1,037 70.21% 438 29.65% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 2 0.14% 599 40.56% 1,477
Thomaston 1,058 63.62% 599 36.02% 6 0.36% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 459 27.60% 1,663
Thompson 716 48.44% 757 51.22% 3 0.20% 1 0.07% 1 0.07% -41 -2.77% 1,478
Tolland 256 58.99% 173 39.86% 3 0.69% 0 0.00% 2 0.46% 83 19.12% 434
Torrington 4,433 54.13% 3,702 45.21% 24 0.29% 23 0.28% 7 0.09% 731 8.93% 8,189
Trumbull 883 73.95% 305 25.54% 4 0.34% 1 0.08% 1 0.08% 578 48.41% 1,194
Union 81 76.42% 25 23.58% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 56 52.83% 106
Vernon 2,053 55.92% 1,544 42.06% 49 1.33% 11 0.30% 14 0.38% 509 13.87% 3,671
Voluntown 98 45.37% 115 53.24% 1 0.46% 2 0.93% 0 0.00% -17 -7.87% 216
Wallingford 2,663 52.05% 2,417 47.24% 28 0.55% 4 0.08% 4 0.08% 246 4.81% 5,116
Warren 86 66.15% 42 32.31% 2 1.54% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 44 33.85% 130
Washington 640 72.15% 245 27.62% 2 0.23% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 395 44.53% 887
Waterbury 13,846 41.43% 19,363 57.93% 163 0.49% 30 0.09% 20 0.06% -5,517 -16.51% 33,422
Waterford 1,153 72.93% 405 25.62% 20 1.27% 2 0.13% 1 0.06% 748 47.31% 1,581
Watertown 1,620 72.42% 610 27.27% 4 0.18% 3 0.13% 0 0.00% 1,010 45.15% 2,237
West Hartford 7,090 71.98% 2,721 27.62% 30 0.30% 6 0.06% 3 0.03% 4,369 44.36% 9,850
West Haven 5,703 57.09% 4,201 42.05% 55 0.55% 10 0.10% 21 0.21% 1,502 15.04% 9,990
Westbrook 322 73.18% 109 24.77% 7 1.59% 0 0.00% 2 0.45% 213 48.41% 440
Weston 257 73.43% 89 25.43% 2 0.57% 2 0.57% 0 0.00% 168 48.00% 350
Westport 1,628 67.52% 775 32.14% 4 0.17% 2 0.08% 2 0.08% 853 35.38% 2,411
Wethersfield 2,144 76.43% 649 23.14% 11 0.39% 1 0.04% 0 0.00% 1,495 53.30% 2,805
Willington 333 78.72% 87 20.57% 1 0.24% 1 0.24% 1 0.24% 246 58.16% 423
Wilton 659 77.53% 185 21.76% 4 0.47% 1 0.12% 1 0.12% 474 55.76% 850
Winchester 2,128 59.54% 1,439 40.26% 3 0.08% 1 0.03% 3 0.08% 689 19.28% 3,574
Windham 2,571 46.68% 2,921 53.03% 15 0.27% 0 0.00% 1 0.02% -350 -6.35% 5,508
Windsor 1,873 65.31% 978 34.10% 12 0.42% 5 0.17% 0 0.00% 895 31.21% 2,868
Windsor Locks 395 26.33% 1,098 73.20% 4 0.27% 1 0.07% 2 0.13% -703 -46.87% 1,500
Wolcott 259 75.95% 78 22.87% 4 1.17% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 181 53.08% 341
Woodbridge 431 78.51% 117 21.31% 1 0.18% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 314 57.19% 549
Woodbury 590 84.17% 108 15.41% 1 0.14% 2 0.29% 0 0.00% 482 68.76% 701
Woodstock 618 85.60% 102 14.13% 1 0.14% 1 0.14% 0 0.00% 516 71.47% 722
Totals 296,641 53.63% 252,085 45.58% 3,030 0.55% 737 0.13% 616 0.11% 44,556 8.06% 553,109

See also edit

Notes edit

  1. ^ After La Follette, who in 1924 won one-sixth of the national vote and almost one-third in the one-party Republican[4] Pacific States, died in June 1925, his family endorsed Smith.[6]
  2. ^ As of the 2020 presidential election, Hartford has never voted for a Republican presidential candidate since this election.

References edit

  1. ^ Phillips, Kevin P. The Emerging Republican Majority. pp. 30–34. ISBN 978-0-691-16324-6.
  2. ^ Reichley, A. James (2004). Faith in Politics. p. 201. ISBN 0815773749.
  3. ^ Harpine, William D. From the Front Porch to the Front Page: McKinley and Bryan in the 1896 Presidential Campaign. pp. 166–167. ISBN 9781585444502.
  4. ^ a b Burnham, Walter Dean (1971). "The System of 1896". In Kleppner, Paul (ed.). The Evolution of American Electoral Systems. pp. 176–179. ISBN 0-313-21379-8.
  5. ^ Lichtman, Allan J. Prejudice and the Old Politics: The Presidential Election of 1928. pp. 93–96. ISBN 0739101269.
  6. ^ Menendez, Albert J. (2005). The Geography of Presidential Elections in the United States, 1868-2004. p. 59. ISBN 0786422173.
  7. ^ Phillips, Kevin P.; The Emerging Republican Majority, p. 502 ISBN 1400852293
  8. ^ "The Pathfinder's Straw Vote". Santa Cruz Evening News. Santa Cruz, California. September 28, 1928. p. 3.
  9. ^ "Hoover Leads Digest Poll — Smith Has Slight Lead in Arkansas, Only Southern Listed". The Huntington Herald. Huntington, Indiana. October 5, 1928. p. 1.
  10. ^ "Here's More About Hoover Leads". The Huntington Herald. Huntington, Indiana. October 19, 1928. p. 8.
  11. ^ Morgan, James (October 10, 1928). "The Political Tide: The 20 States That Will Decide the Election". The Boston Globe. Boston, Massachusetts. p. 18.
  12. ^ "Babson's Statistics Do Not Assure G.O.P. Governor Is Gaining — Kentucky Supporters Will Probably Turn State for New Yorker and Strength in Missouri Increased; Statistician Declares Smith's Popularity Steadily Increasing". The Bristol Herald-Courier. Bristol, Tennessee. October 21, 1928. p. B1.
  13. ^ "1928 Presidential General Election Results — Connecticut". U.S. Election Atlas. Retrieved December 23, 2013.
  14. ^ "1928 Statement of Vote" (PDF). CT.gov - Connecticut's Official State Website. pp. 13–14. Retrieved January 8, 2023.